The best Side of pld case laws

The best Side of pld case laws

Blog Article

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only finished In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or Woman will not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they can Reduce off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by regulation.

Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more

A lot of the volumes (such as more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.

Apart from the rules of more info procedure for precedent, the burden specified to any reported judgment may possibly rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]

However it's made clear that police is free to consider action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain regard on the family get rid of in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security from the house is concerned, which just isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been obtained. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.

The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is usually important to note that neither seniority nor promotion could be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion can be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for turning out to be entitled to be regarded for promotion to a higher grade, of course, is not really without logic since the officer that's originally inducted to the particular post needs to serve on the stated post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public in the befitting fashion.

States also ordinarily have courts that cope with only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending around the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case regulation can be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is just not strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one particular district court in The big apple is just not binding on another district court, but the original court’s reasoning may help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more